Blog entry for:
Sat, Oct 22, 2016 08:57:14 AM
≕ the committee ≔
posted: Sat, Oct 22, 2016 08:57:14 AM
in my mind, is the most accurate of the memes that many of my peers use to express how addiction warps their thinking. i have reached the point in my own recovery, that i have no opinion on how they express what addiction is, and how addiction affects their day to day living. me? well i have moved into the “whole” addict sort of paradigm. i am the addict and the addict is me. it is not some sinister, cunning or baffling force from within, it is just me. part of becoming whole to me, is the integration of all those parts of my personality, not the least being the addict within, leads me to some astonishing revelations an the first and foremost being, that it is me who wants to use, not my addict inside. it is me who is unwilling or perhaps even unable to cope without the use of a little sumthin', sumthin'. it is me, that is at the root of all my problems and it is me who lies to myself that i can do “just one.”
once i remove all the references to0 addiction as a separate and distinct pieces of me, the weird get going and everything i thought, takes on a new and deeper meaning. i become responsible to counter the voice that says i can be okay if only… i am now responsible to seek out help in the times i need to and offer that same help when asked. for me the biggest adjustment to my thinking is that as a part of the whole me, i can no longer single out addiction as the blame for my failings. it is not like a diabetic walks around saying their diabetes is telling them that it would be a good idea to raid the candy bowl. i chose diabetes, because that is the disease i heard addiction compared to often enough, way back when. the fact is, if i accept that i am an addict and addiction is a disease, like diabetics, then my treatment and doing the next right thing for myself, falls on to me and not some mythical committee in my head. if i accept that the addict is me, and i am the addict, than i also need to accept that all the information i receive for the world around me, has been run through the filter of addiction as well as my prejudices and biases. by the time i GET to act on that information, the chances of it being 100% accurate are practically nil, and i NEED to be careful about what i do next. in this sens, perhaps the notion of “first thought wrong,” might just apply.
taking all of this into account and dismissing the worry and frustration i feel from time to time, when i hear my peers, separating everything out, i can move forward as a whole being, rather than in bits and pieces. more and more i feel less and less of a desire to preach about how there is no invisible hand at work in my life. there is no part of me that wants me dead, but will settle for me loaded. what i get today is a sense, that i was the one who consciously chooses to be clean today and if somehow i happen to have a drink or a toke, it it will be because i consciously choose to do so and it will be a relapse and not a “slip.”
which brings me to a pet peeve of mind. where in the world did the recovery industry get the notion that “just one session of using” was a “slip” and not a relapse. i heard that notion at a meeting yesterday and it reminded me of what i heard way back when i was in treatment. one slips on a wet floor, when one chooses to use, it is a fVcking relapse and one needs top deal with that event as such. “softening the blow” or protecting someone's fragile self-esteem, through word games and idea manipulation is no different than the Ministry of Information and their infamous slogans: War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength!
the world of a recovering addict is tough enough already without all the doublespeak and tiptoeing around that professionals and many of my peers seem to think is necessary to make recovery attractive to the still using addict. what is, is that recovery treats all of me, and what is not is that there is some part of me that requires suppression or excision. i am okay with that notion, at least, just for today and yes one toke, one sip, one line is a relapse in my book, so do not come around whining about just once as if we need to seek forgiveness. addicts use, and one vcan be certain that if the day arrives that i choose to use, i will not be crying about how “my addict inside made me do it!”
once i remove all the references to0 addiction as a separate and distinct pieces of me, the weird get going and everything i thought, takes on a new and deeper meaning. i become responsible to counter the voice that says i can be okay if only… i am now responsible to seek out help in the times i need to and offer that same help when asked. for me the biggest adjustment to my thinking is that as a part of the whole me, i can no longer single out addiction as the blame for my failings. it is not like a diabetic walks around saying their diabetes is telling them that it would be a good idea to raid the candy bowl. i chose diabetes, because that is the disease i heard addiction compared to often enough, way back when. the fact is, if i accept that i am an addict and addiction is a disease, like diabetics, then my treatment and doing the next right thing for myself, falls on to me and not some mythical committee in my head. if i accept that the addict is me, and i am the addict, than i also need to accept that all the information i receive for the world around me, has been run through the filter of addiction as well as my prejudices and biases. by the time i GET to act on that information, the chances of it being 100% accurate are practically nil, and i NEED to be careful about what i do next. in this sens, perhaps the notion of “first thought wrong,” might just apply.
taking all of this into account and dismissing the worry and frustration i feel from time to time, when i hear my peers, separating everything out, i can move forward as a whole being, rather than in bits and pieces. more and more i feel less and less of a desire to preach about how there is no invisible hand at work in my life. there is no part of me that wants me dead, but will settle for me loaded. what i get today is a sense, that i was the one who consciously chooses to be clean today and if somehow i happen to have a drink or a toke, it it will be because i consciously choose to do so and it will be a relapse and not a “slip.”
which brings me to a pet peeve of mind. where in the world did the recovery industry get the notion that “just one session of using” was a “slip” and not a relapse. i heard that notion at a meeting yesterday and it reminded me of what i heard way back when i was in treatment. one slips on a wet floor, when one chooses to use, it is a fVcking relapse and one needs top deal with that event as such. “softening the blow” or protecting someone's fragile self-esteem, through word games and idea manipulation is no different than the Ministry of Information and their infamous slogans: War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength!
the world of a recovering addict is tough enough already without all the doublespeak and tiptoeing around that professionals and many of my peers seem to think is necessary to make recovery attractive to the still using addict. what is, is that recovery treats all of me, and what is not is that there is some part of me that requires suppression or excision. i am okay with that notion, at least, just for today and yes one toke, one sip, one line is a relapse in my book, so do not come around whining about just once as if we need to seek forgiveness. addicts use, and one vcan be certain that if the day arrives that i choose to use, i will not be crying about how “my addict inside made me do it!”
∞ DT ∞
The views expressed on this page are solely the opinion of the author.
While the author is a member of a 12 Step recovery fellowship, these writings are not intended to endorse or express the published wisdom of any fellowship.
These writings are not meant to be socially or politically correct, and if you take issue with any opinions expressed, please seek the guidance of someone wiser than me.
While the author is a member of a 12 Step recovery fellowship, these writings are not intended to endorse or express the published wisdom of any fellowship.
These writings are not meant to be socially or politically correct, and if you take issue with any opinions expressed, please seek the guidance of someone wiser than me.
Another Look!
the voice of addiction 316 words ➥ Friday, October 22, 2004 by: donnot↔ the program provides me with many voices that counter my addiction, voices i can trust ↔ 439 words ➥ Sunday, October 22, 2006 by: donnot
∞ my disease gives me warped information about what is going on in my life. ∞ 305 words ➥ Monday, October 22, 2007 by: donnot
↔ some may say, **my disease is talking to me.** ↔ 380 words ➥ Wednesday, October 22, 2008 by: donnot
∠ sometimes my addiction tells me i am not responsible for myself and my actions ∠ 584 words ➥ Thursday, October 22, 2009 by: donnot
† addiction is so cunning that it can † 745 words ➥ Friday, October 22, 2010 by: donnot
≡ the ultimate solution, to counter the part of me i call addiction ≡ 335 words ➥ Saturday, October 22, 2011 by: donnot
> the part of me i call addiction, < 483 words ➥ Monday, October 22, 2012 by: donnot
× i will dismiss the **voice** of addiction × 704 words ➥ Tuesday, October 22, 2013 by: donnot
≈ the part of me i call addiction ≈ 667 words ➥ Wednesday, October 22, 2014 by: donnot
⇔ look who*s talking ⇔ 224 words ➥ Thursday, October 22, 2015 by: donnot
🙶 the voice 🙷 667 words ➥ Sunday, October 22, 2017 by: donnot
👄 doing my best 👂 571 words ➥ Monday, October 22, 2018 by: donnot
🎤 impossible situations 💬 631 words ➥ Tuesday, October 22, 2019 by: donnot
🕱 an incurable malady 🕱 605 words ➥ Thursday, October 22, 2020 by: donnot
🗬 warped information 🗫 465 words ➥ Friday, October 22, 2021 by: donnot
🤕 my sense 🤯 369 words ➥ Saturday, October 22, 2022 by: donnot
😶 finding humility 😒 381 words ➥ Sunday, October 22, 2023 by: donnot
😏 knowing when 😎 482 words ➥ Tuesday, October 22, 2024 by: donnot
☯ The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao ☯
by Lao-Tse
Translated by James Legge
Book 2
He who in (Tao's) wars has skill
Assumes no martial port;
He who fights with most good will
To rage makes no resort.
He who vanquishes yet still
Keeps from his foes apart;
He whose hests men most fulfil
Yet humbly plies his art.
Thus we say, 'He ne'er contends,
And therein is his might.'
Thus we say, 'Men's wills he bends,
That they with him unite.'
Thus we say, 'Like Heaven's his ends,
No sage of old more bright.'